How to find topics your competitors already own
A content gap analysis helps you uncover content opportunities based on evidence rather than assumptions. The core idea is simple, your competitors rank for topics and keywords that you donāt currently cover well, or donāt cover at all. When you identify these gaps, you can build a content plan that targets proven demand, and expand into topics that already drive traffic in your niche.
Search Console with content analysis tools
The most powerful part is that content gap analysis isnāt just about āstealingā keywords. Itās about understanding why competitors win, and then creating something more helpful, more complete, and better aligned with search intent. You can accelerate this workflow by combining your own data from Google Search Console with content analysis tools, and by using AI to structure content and identify missing coverage. If you want help generating better content structure and coverage faster, take a look at the Rank Monitor AI Content Tool, https://rankmonitor.com/features/ai/ai-content-tool/.

Where the best gap insights come from
Your own data should always be your starting point. Search Console shows what Google already associates with your site, including queries where you get impressions but rank too low to earn clicks. From there, you compare that footprint against competitor topics to find gaps worth prioritizing.
Good sources for content gap insights include,
-
Google Search Console, for queries you appear for but underperform on
-
Existing landing pages and blog content, to spot thin coverage or missing intent
-
Competitor pages that rank consistently, especially those dominating topic clusters
-
SERP patterns, such as āhow-toā, āpricingā, ācomparisonā, ābestā, and ānear meā intents
How to turn gaps into a simple, repeatable plan
Once you have your gap list, the key is to organize it into something actionable. The fastest results usually come from improving content that already exists, then expanding high-performing pages, and only after that building entirely new pages where you have no coverage.
A practical way to prioritize content gaps is,
-
Quick wins, pages that rank on page 2 and only need better completeness or structure
-
Expansions, strong pages that need additional sections, FAQs, or deeper subtopic coverage
-
New pages, missing topics that deserve a dedicated page because intent is unique
-
Competitive takeovers, topics where competitors rank with weak content you can beat




